Dave Anderson wrote:
Takao Indoh wrote:In addition to the previous patch to dump_mem_map_SPARSEMEM(),>
> However, page_to_phys returns 0x100000000. I think page_to_phys does not
> support sparsemem system.
>
>Yeah -- the is_page_ptr() function needs to be enhanced
to support SPARSEMEM kernels...I made a bunch of updates to the original SPARSEMEM patch
in 4.0-3.3, but missed this one.Dave
is_page_ptr(ulong addr, physaddr_t *phys)
{
int n;
ulong ppstart, ppend;
struct node_table *nt;
ulong pgnum, node_size;
+ ulong nr, sec_addr;
+ ulong nr_mem_sections;
+ ulong coded_mem_map, mem_map,
end_mem_map;
+ physaddr_t section_paddr;
+
+ if (IS_SPARSEMEM()) {
+
nr_mem_sections = NR_MEM_SECTIONS();
+
for (nr = 0; nr <= nr_mem_sections ; nr++) {
+
if ((sec_addr = valid_section_nr(nr))) {
+
coded_mem_map = section_mem_map_addr(sec_addr);
+
mem_map = sparse_decode_mem_map(coded_mem_map, nr);
+
end_mem_map = mem_map + (PAGES_PER_SECTION() * SIZE(page));
+
+
if ((addr >= mem_map) && (addr < end_mem_map)) {
+
if ((addr - mem_map) % SIZE(page))
+
return FALSE;
+
if (phys) {
+
section_paddr = PTOB(section_nr_to_pfn(nr));
+
pgnum = (addr - mem_map) / SIZE(page);
+
*phys = section_paddr + (pgnum * PAGESIZE());
+
}
+
return TRUE;
+
}
+
}
+
}
+
return FALSE;
+ }
for (n = 0; n < vt->numnodes;
n++) {
nt = &vt->node_table[n];
Thanks,
Dave