On 29 June 2016 at 04:35, Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Takahiro,
>
> Without this patch -- aside from in-kernel exception frames not
> getting found and displayed -- does everything else work OK?

​All what I can say is that this is the only issue that I have noticed so far
on VHE-enabled system.​
So the "subject" may be overstated.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> Dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On VHE-enabled system, the kernel runs in EL2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arm64.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
> > index bad36aa..b9fa14d 100644
> > --- a/arm64.c
> > +++ b/arm64.c
> > @@ -1414,6 +1414,8 @@ arm64_is_kernel_exception_frame(struct bt_info *bt,
> > ulong stkptr)
> >               {
> >               case PSR_MODE_EL1t:
> >               case PSR_MODE_EL1h:
> > +             case PSR_MODE_EL2t:
> > +             case PSR_MODE_EL2h:
> >                       return TRUE;
> >               }
> >       }
> > --
> > 2.9.0
> >
> > --
> > Crash-utility mailing list
> > Crash-utility@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
> >
>
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility