Hi Tao & Kazu,

Thanks for the comments.

Yes, I guess if we all agree that 1 thread gdb is better, then I and
Aditya can work together to clean up the code, e.g. rearrange the
powerpc series and mine. I agree the code which gets added and then
removed should be cleaned up in later patchsets.

Let's rebase our patch series then.
As of now it's a lot of dependent patches here and there. I think maybe your "Leave only one thread for gdb" commit should go first. It simplifies the implementation.

And, with it being 1 gdb thread, and all of us using 'CURRENT_CONTEXT', I guess it makes sense to rename 'machdep->get_cpu_reg' to 'machdep->get_current_reg'.

Any comments ?

I think you're going to do this later though, just in case.

Thanks,
Tao Liu

[1] https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki#writing-patches

Thanks,
Kazu

--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki