On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 8:22 PM Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com> wrote:
> +             if (IS_A_NUMBER(args[optind])) {

wouldn't it be easier to simply add

  if (!IS_A_NUMBER(args[optind])) {
        optind++;
        continue;
  }

instead of moving the whole body of the loop inside the if-block. Or
did I miss something?


Thank you for the comment, Philipp.

I saw the similar code style in the task.c, just followed these changes.

But anyway, the above changes also look better to me.

Thanks.
Lianbo