On 10/16/13 09:09, Dave Anderson wrote:
----- Original Message -----
I have some code that allows this. See the following mail thread:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/174807
The questions are:
1. Does remote access have a specification?
If you're talking about the remote.c file in the crash sources, no,
there's nothing other than the remote.c file itself.
Ok, looks like I will need to write something up.
2. Is it supported?
It's been deprecated for almost 10 years now. I don't understand how
you have been able to even get it to build, never mind work as the mail
thread indicates?
crash is still building remote.c in 7.0.2-0 and still accepts the
command line option:
don-760:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/crash-7.0.2>./crash -d99
localhost:5001
crash 7.0.2
Copyright (C) 2002-2013 Red Hat, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2010 IBM Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Hewlett-Packard Co
Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012 Fujitsu Limited
Copyright (C) 2006, 2007 VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.
Copyright (C) 2005, 2011 NEC Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999, 2002, 2007 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Mission Critical
Linux, Inc.
This program is free software, covered by the GNU General
Public License,
and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies
of it under
certain conditions. Enter "help copying" to see the
conditions.
This program has absolutely no warranty. Enter "help
warranty" for details.
server: [localhost]
port: [5001]
file1: [(null)]
file2: [(null)]
127.0.0.1
don-760.cloudswitch.com: Unknown host
crash: connect [don-760.cloudswitch.com:5001] failed
don-760:~/rpmbuild/BUILD/crash-7.0.2>
But I don't know anything about xen_crash, xentrace,
or how it even interacts with the crash utility? It looks like it might
replace the old "crashd" daemon that was built as part of the old remote
access facility?
Yes, that is the case. My guess is that using crashd was more pain
the help. However the big plus in the case is that the guest (domU)
is paused while crash is running and so can be seen more like a dump
and not a active system. I have found that crash has some issues
between active, remote, and dump modes; but most of them are speed
related or start-up like guessing the kernel version.
3. Should the code be part of xen or crash?
I don't know. Xen support is no longer something I'm actively involved
with since Red Hat dropped support for it. Since then, Xen support in
the crash utility has primarily come from Daniel Kiper from Oracle and
Petr Tesarik from SUSE. They are both on the list, and should see this
message, but I'll cc them in this response as well.
Thanks,
Dave
I think david.vrabel@citrix.com is also involved now (adding to CC
list).
-Don Slutz
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility