Castor's patch fixed a 2.x gcc compiler failure here because
of the inadvertant double semi-colon:

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 kernel_init(int when)
 {
        int i;
-       char *p1, *p2, buf[BUFSIZE];;
+       char *p1, *p2, buf[BUFSIZE];
        struct syment *sp1, *sp2;

...which I wasn't aware of, since I haven't been testing builds with
that era compiler for a some time now.  But in doing so, I see that
gcc 2.96 won't compile diskdump.c either:

cc -c -g -DX86 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 diskdump.c
In file included from diskdump.c:24:
diskdump.h:49: array size missing in `tasks'
make[3]: *** [diskdump.o] Error 1

because of the tasks member at the end of this struct:

struct disk_dump_header {
        char                    signature[SIG_LEN];     /* = "DISKDUMP" */
        int                     header_version; /* Dump header version */
        struct new_utsname      utsname;        /* copy of system_utsname */
        struct timeval          timestamp;      /* Time stamp */
        unsigned int            status;         /* Above flags */
        int                     block_size;     /* Size of a block in byte */
        int                     sub_hdr_size;   /* Size of arch dependent
                                                   header in blocks */
        unsigned int            bitmap_blocks;  /* Size of Memory bitmap in
                                                   block */
        unsigned int            max_mapnr;      /* = max_mapnr */
        unsigned int            total_ram_blocks;/* Number of blocks should be
                                                   written */
        unsigned int            device_blocks;  /* Number of total blocks in
                                                 * the dump device */
        unsigned int            written_blocks; /* Number of written blocks */
        unsigned int            current_cpu;    /* CPU# which handles dump */
        int                     nr_cpus;        /* Number of CPUs */
        struct task_struct      *tasks[];
};

Can this be changed to: struct task_struct **tasks;
and get away with it?

Dave