On 2024/06/07 15:13, Lianbo Jiang wrote:

> The above two for-loop code blocks seem duplicated a little bit, but I
> have no better way too.
>
> Let's go with this, so for the patch: Ack.

Thank you for the review.  Yes, I also thought of a few other ways but
finally this looks simple and fast enough.

Thanks,
Kazu