Petr,
Are the sources different the openSUSE patches?
Dave
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
Date:09/04/2014 12:27 PM (GMT-05:00)
Cc: "Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development"
Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] Heads-up re: ppc64le support in crash-7.0.8
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com> wrote:
> Petr, Michel, et al,
Hi Dave et al.,
FWIW the upcoming SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 release will ship a
crash utility that works on ppc64le, and I think IBM has already tested
it successfully. I'll see how I can make the latest sources available on
a public site.
Petr Tesarik
> I'm currently working on adding ppc64le support for the next upstream
> crash release. I'm working from a Fedora bugzilla filed by Michel Normand,
> where he that applied the "crash-gdb-7.6.series" set of patches from the openSUSE
> distribution. Thanks Michel for doing the initial legwork using the Fedora
> tree.
>
> For the upstream crash utility repo, I do not want to carry the set of 9 patches
> individually, but similar to the singular gdb-7.6.patch, I plan to concatenate
> them into a singular gdb-7.6-ppc64le-support.patch.
>
> Ideally the contents of the 9 patch files could be added to the gdb-7.6.patch,
> and I may do that in the future.
>
> However, just the crash-gdb-7.6-bound_minimal_symbol.patch in the 9-part set
> is so large and intrusive (touching dozens of arch-neutral files) that
> I am paranoid about breaking something, or altering behavior for the
> other architectures. So I plan to take a more cautious route for now,
> and only apply the gdb-7.6-ppc64le-support.patch if the build host is
> ppc64le.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility