On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:28 PM Tao Liu <ltao@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lianbo,
>
> Just FYI, yesterday Alexy made a new PR[1], which trying to integrate
> the vmware_guestdump [2] onto the gdb stack unwinding. So I made a
> rebase[3], which will be the potential "v3: gdb stack unwinding
> support for crash utility". If possible, could you test and review on
> this [3] please?

Currently I have informed Alexey and Aditya about the [3], and I have
finished my testing on it, the result looks fine to me. After their

testing, if no problem, then I will post [3] to upstream as the
official v3 patchset.

>
> Thanks,
> Tao Liu
>
> [1]: https://github.com/liutgnu/crash-dev/pull/2
> [2]: https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io/msg00683.html
> [3]: https://github.com/liutgnu/crash-dev/tree/tao-rebase-v4
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:13 PM Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Tao
> >
> > Thank you for the update.
> >
> > I will look at the v2 later, maybe take some time to test again.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Lianbo
> >
> > On 4/28/24 12:02, devel-request@lists.crash-utility.osci.io wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 12:01:57 +0800
> > > From: Tao Liu<ltao@redhat.com>
> > > Subject: [Crash-utility] [Crash-Utility][PATCH v2 00/13] gdb stack
> > >       unwinding support for crash utility
> > > To:devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
> > > Cc: Tao Liu<ltao@redhat.com>
> > > Message-ID:<20240428040210.11474-1-ltao@redhat.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > >
> > > This patchset is a rebase/merged version of the following 3 patchsets:
> > >
> > > 1): [PATCH v10 0/5] Improve stack unwind on ppc64 [1]
> > > 2): [PATCH 0/5] x86_64 gdb stack unwinding support [2]
> > > 3): Clean up on top of one-thread-v2 [3]
> > >
> > > A complete description of gdb stack unwinding support for crash can be
> > > found in [1].
> > >
> > > This patchset can be divided into the following 2 parts:
> > >
> > > 1) part1: arch independent, mainly modify on the
> > > crash_target.c/gdb_interface.c files, in preparation of the
> > > gdb side.
> > > 2) part2: arch specific part, for implementing ppc64/x86_64/arm64 gdb
> > > stack unwinding support.
> > >
> > > === part 2
> > > arm64: Add gdb stack unwinding support
> > > Fix cpumask_t recursive dependence issue
> > > Parse stack by inactive_stack_frame priorily if the struct is valid
> > > x86_64: Add gdb stack unwinding support
> > > ppc64: correct gdb passthroughs by implementing machdep->get_cpu_reg
> > >
> > > === part 1
> > > Stop stack unwinding at non-kernel address
> > > Fix gdb_interface: restore gdb's output streams at end of gdb_interface
> > > Print task pid/command instead of CPU index
> > > Rename get_cpu_reg to get_current_task_reg
> > > Let crash change gdb context
> > > Leave only one gdb thread for crash
> > > Remove 'frame' from prohibited commands list
> > > ===
> > >
> > > v2 -> v1:
> > > 1) Added the patch: x86_64: Fix invalid input "=>" for bt command,
> > >     thanks for Kazu's testing.
> > > 2) Modify the patch: x86_64: Add gdb stack unwinding support, added the
> > >     pcp_save, spp_save and sp, for restoring the value in match of the original
> > >     code logic.
> > >
> > > [1]:https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io/msg00469.html
> > > [2]:https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io/msg00488.html
> > > [3]:https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io/msg00554.html
> > >
> > > Aditya Gupta (2):
> > >    Remove 'frame' from prohibited commands list
> > >    ppc64: correct gdb passthroughs by implementing machdep->get_cpu_reg
> > >
> > > Tao Liu (11):
> > >    Leave only one gdb thread for crash
> > >    Let crash change gdb context
> > >    Rename get_cpu_reg to get_current_task_reg
> > >    Print task pid/command instead of CPU index
> > >    Fix gdb_interface: restore gdb's output streams at end of
> > >      gdb_interface
> > >    Stop stack unwinding at non-kernel address
> > >    x86_64: Add gdb stack unwinding support
> > >    Parse stack by inactive_stack_frame priorily if the struct is valid
> > >    Fix cpumask_t recursive dependence issue
> > >    x86_64: Fix invalid input "=>" for bt command
> > >    arm64: Add gdb stack unwinding support
> > >
> > >   arm64.c         | 114 +++++++++++++++++-
> > >   crash_target.c  |  47 +++++---
> > >   defs.h          | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >   gdb-10.2.patch  |  79 +++++++++++++
> > >   gdb_interface.c |  33 ++----
> > >   kernel.c        |  61 ++++++++--
> > >   ppc64.c         | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >   task.c          |  30 +++--
> > >   tools.c         |   8 +-
> > >   x86_64.c        | 299 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >   10 files changed, 916 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > -- 2.40.1
> > --
> > Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
> > https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
> > Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki