Hello Dave,
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:56 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
Hi Michael,
A couple minor points about this patch...
I moved the two new offset_table entries to the end of
the structure. Since the offset_table is exported to extension
modules, changing members in the middle of the structure could
easily break a module that was compiled against an earlier
version. And I added displays of the new offset_table and
size_table entries in dump_offset_table() used by "help -o".
Fine, thanks!
I'm not particularly enamored with the use of the zero-filled
"double-number" frame fields -- mainly because it's different
than all of the other architectures (even the s390).
The other arches just move the asterisk one field to the left if the frame
number goes into double figures, keeping the remaining fields
lined up:
fprintf(fp, "%s#%d [ ...
level < 10 ? " " : "",
While I try not to interfere with architecture maintainers,
is there a particular reason you want to do it that way?
No problem. This is also fine with me. Should I change this or do you
want to do that?
Michael