Hi Kazu,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:41:12AM +0000, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:
On 2024/02/05 15:36, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> @@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ cmd_set(void)
> error(INFO, "no panic task found!\n");
> return;
> }
> - set_context(tt->panic_task, NO_PID);
> + set_context(tt->panic_task, NO_PID, FALSE);
How about TRUE for "set -p" too?
Yes, it makes sense. I will change it to TRUE.
Thanks,
Aditya Gupta
>
> Thanks,
> Kazu
>
> > show_context(CURRENT_CONTEXT());
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -2559,14 +2559,14 @@ cmd_set(void)
> > case STR_PID:
> > pid = value;
> > task = NO_TASK;
> > - if (set_context(task, pid))
> > + if (set_context(task, pid, FALSE))
> > show_context(CURRENT_CONTEXT());
> > break;
> >
> > case STR_TASK:
> > task = value;
> > pid = NO_PID;
> > - if (set_context(task, pid))
> > + if (set_context(task, pid, FALSE))
> > show_context(CURRENT_CONTEXT());
> > break;
> >