Re: JWW SPAM-bad-from [Crash-utility] enhance bt command

On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:19 -0500, Dave Anderson wrote: > I'm not sure whether cluttering the bt -f command output would > be all that worthwhile, but I'm thinking that this request may have > some merit with respect to the "rd" command. Currently the > "rd -s" option recognizes and translates kernel symbols that it > finds in the raw memory output. Maybe something like a "-S" > option could do that -- plus also recognize kernel virtual memory > addresses that come from the slab cache, and alternatively display > the slab cache namestring in some recognizable manner, i.e. bracketed, > or something like to that effect. > > Then since "bt -f" displays the block of memory associated with > each stack frame, you could easily transfer the stack address > to a "rd -S [stack-address] [count]" command. yes. it will be great if we can have a rd -S!