On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> It's almost on the way. The only problem I have is that
'bpf' only prints a
> blank line for linux-next but works totally fine on upstream. So I currently
> don't know if there's still a problem or if there simply is no bpf program.
> At least the error is gone :)
That's most likely the case. If you print out the "prog_idr" or
"map_idr" structures,
their "xa_head" pointer are probably NULL.
You are right. I also found some warnings in dmes not allowing BPF. Looks like
there is some problem in linux-next.
v2 is on its way.
Philipp
Dave
> Thanks
> Philipp
>
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > > Thanks
> > > Philipp
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > PS: the
> > > >
> > > > "
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Philipp
> > > > >
> > > > > Philipp Rudo (1):
> > > > > Fix for XArray/radix_tree rework on linux-next
> > > > >
> > > > > bpf.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > > > ipcs.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > > task.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > > > > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.16.4
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>