On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> Well, first off, it's kind of stupid to run the same .crashrc file twice,
> isn't it? I shall fix that oversight henceforth...
Yes, I suppose so, but I was actually seeing this first with
a local .crashrc...
>
> That leaves the case where "bt -O" is set in both the $HOME and
> local .crashrc files. Whereas the local .crashrc is meant to override
> whatever might be in the $HOME .crashrc, the "bt -O" case still wants
> to be idempotent. That can be addressed by a little tinkering with cmd_bt(),
> because the pc->flags will have RCHOME_IFILE or RCLOCAL_IFILE
> set when it's executing those .crashrc commands.
>
> With those two fixes in hand, we can keep "bt -O" simple-minded.
There's also the potential case of the command line "-i inputfile" option.
But the initialization-time rule should still apply -- if "bt -O" is contained
in
any or all of the 3 possible initialization-time input files ($HOME/.crashrc,
./.crashrc, or "-i inputfile" files), the setting will remain idempotent.
I also fixed the redundant running of $HOME/.crashrc and ./.crashrc
files if they are the same file.
Just so I understand, what you're saying is that if 'bt -O' is specified
in an initialization file, it always means 'use old' otherwise it's a toggle?
-castor