----- "Luc Chouinard" <Luc.Chouinard(a)trueposition.com> wrote:
Got it.
Yes, this is the proper fix.
Please go ahead and submit it.
Thanks.
-Luc
Queued for the next release.
Dave
>
> Agreed, so would the following be the correct patch?
> ---
> extensions/sial.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/extensions/sial.c
> +++ b/extensions/sial.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,10 @@ int nidx=0;
> type=0;
> break;
>
> + case TYPE_CODE_BOOL:
> + sial_parsetype("char", t, ref);
> + type=0;
> + break;
> case TYPE_CODE_UNION:
> sial_type_mkunion(t);
> goto label;
>
>
>