* Troy Heber <troy.heber(a)hp.com> [2007-05-02 18:56]:
On 05/02/07 17:58, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> That was no IA64 machine. It was x86_64 and 2.6.5. (In fact, the patch
> doesn't retrieve the registers on IA64 for the stack pointer.)
Sorry, I should have broken the paragraph there, it was more of a
assertion that IA64 is fine, i.e. no reason to change.
Ok. Actually, the patch doesn't change the behaviour on IA64, it just
refactores it because of the x86_64 change.
> Why do we need to guess the registers if we really *have* it in
the
> dump? What's wrong with the general idea to fetch the dump header
> and to use that information?
To address all of Dave's concerns with the submitted patch. It was
simply a question of, if there is a simple workaround can we just use
that instead to minimize the changes. I didn't mean to imply that
accessing the arch specific dump header was bad idea, it's just that
its arch specific and requires a rather large patch.
I'll take a look if I can fix the problem with a workaround. Give me a
few days to find time ... ;-)
Thanks,
Bernhard