-----Original Message-----
Hi, Firo
Thank you for the explanation.
I have no objection, because it's just a cosmetic change in the code
style. Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com>
> Hi Lianbo, after thinking about this code for a while, I think
the code
> refactoring is not necessary because
> 1) the original code makes more sense to express the mutual exclusive
> semantics between -H (ld->flags & LIST_HEAD_POINTER) and -h.
>
> 2) LIST_HEAD_OFFSET_ENTERED and LIST_OFFSET_ENTERED don't have to
> be at same level because LIST_HEAD_OFFSET_ENTERED is just a sub-option for -h.
>
> So please consider accepting the original patch.
Ok, applied with some cosmetic adjustments I found.
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/f091b5e76d2d6e81b12cd40df7b...
Thanks,
Kazu