----- "Robin Holt" <holt(a)sgi.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:41:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> ----- "Robin Holt" <holt(a)sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:22:39PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > > But for kdump vmcores, it seems that kdump_page_size() needs to
> > > be made smarter, although I'm not sure where would it get the
> > > page size -- vmcoreinfo?
> >
> > This was an ia64 kdump created vmcore. I am a little confused about the
> > difference, but that little tiny bit, I do know.
> >
> > Robin
>
> Now I'm confused -- if you're looking at an ia64 kdump vmcore, then
> why did your patch modify the diskdump code?
I don't know what I am doing. I found the code that was executing (love
that prinktf debugging), looked at what was going wrong, adjusted code
until it worked, quilt refresh'd and emailed.
No -- you did the right thing. That patch looks good...
But if you were to create your 64k-page kdump vmcore *uncompressed*,
and then ran crash on a 16k-page host, then kdump_page_size() would
set the page size to 16k, and I'm pretty sure all hell would break
loose. That's something Bernhard must have addressed in his patch.
Dave