----- "Robin Holt" <holt(a)sgi.com> wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:41:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
 > 
 > ----- "Robin Holt" <holt(a)sgi.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:22:39PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
 > > > But for kdump vmcores, it seems that kdump_page_size() needs to
 > > > be made smarter, although I'm not sure where would it get the
 > > > page size -- vmcoreinfo?
 > > 
 > > This was an ia64 kdump created vmcore.  I am a little confused about the
 > > difference, but that little tiny bit, I do know.
 > > 
 > > Robin
 > 
 > Now I'm confused -- if you're looking at an ia64 kdump vmcore, then
 > why did your patch modify the diskdump code? 
 
 I don't know what I am doing.  I found the code that was executing (love
 that prinktf debugging), looked at what was going wrong, adjusted code
 until it worked, quilt refresh'd and emailed. 
No -- you did the right thing.  That patch looks good...
But if you were to create your 64k-page kdump vmcore *uncompressed*,
and then ran crash on a 16k-page host, then kdump_page_size() would
set the page size to 16k, and I'm pretty sure all hell would break
loose.  That's something Bernhard must have addressed in his patch.
Dave