* Arjan van de Ven [2008-11-16 07:39]:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:47:45 +0100
Bernhard Walle <bwalle(a)suse.de> wrote:
> While the original submission of CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM mentions that
> the option has been in RHEL and Fedora for 4 years without problems,
> that's only a half of the story. The truth is that at least RHEL
> has /dev/crash exactly to circumvent that /dev/mem restriction. Don't
> tell me that this is better than having that sysctl entry. ;-)
I assume /dev/crash is read only
I don't know. But if that matters, why can't we make /dev/mem
write-only for certain areas and read-only for the rest ...?
You either want this at compile time or you don't want it at all.
Why? You don't write something about my arguments (as Alan does, even
though I disagree), you only write that you "nak" it.
Regards,
Bernhard