On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:18 -0800, Haren Myneni wrote:
> But it's your call... so when you and Haren are happy, just
let
> me know.
Badari, Thanks a lot for doing this. This approach is useful to
support easily even for future changes. One minor comment, instead of
hardcoding in ppc64.c source file for 'm->l1_index_size = 9', can we
define INDEX macros in the header file and use them here. For
example, PTE_INDEX_SIZE_L4. I am thinking we can map/understand easily
to see what is l1 or l2. What do you think?
Okay, here is the latest to include what Dave and Haren want.
Please review.
Thanks,
Badari