Re: [Crash-utility] Crash-utility Digest, Vol 179, Issue 4

>> In addition, might it be more reasonable to issue a warning instead of a fatal error? > > hmm, why do you think so? I think FATAL is fine because we cannot proceed > anymore and there is no memory to be released. > When users are trying to use the some commands in crash, crash should give a warning to users if it doesn't support the command yet, but users can still use other commands, the fatal error means that it can not continue to do anythings. Anyway, I have no preference about this. The more important thing is that I didn't reproduce the problem that David mentioned(after applied the above patch). Maybe David could help me give more details.