----- "Dave Anderson" <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- "Guy Streeter" <streeter(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Dave Anderson wrote:
> ...
> How difficult would it be to support one user-specified prefix string,
> or at least look in "./" as well as "/"? This would help a lot
with the
> systems we set up specifically for core analysis. We really don't want
> to install the debuginfo rpms for every kernel we might need to look at
> Updating the system tends to wipe them all out, and iirc they over-write
> some of each other's files.
Right -- see my last email that I just sent before seeing yours.
You already can specify an alternative for the stripped module
directory starting path, but I don't believe it will find the
associated .ko.debug file.
So we're talking about two different scenarios:
(1) Michael has both the /lib/modules/... and /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/...
trees dumped in his current directory, and
(2) I believe you're specifying that only /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/...
tree would be in your current directory.
But with (2), the base stripped module directory starting path still
needs to be there (someplace).
Guy,
Just to clarify...
In other words, are you suggesting that there would be
"./lib" and "./usr" subdirectories in your current directory?
Where the base modules would live under "./lib" and the
debug modules would live under "./usr"? (like Michael's setup)
That would be best -- it would do-able to just enhance the currently-
existing "mod -S [directory]" option to do the right thing automatically
when dealing with split dumpfiles.
I just want to get everybody on the same page.
Dave