Re: [Crash-utility] Adding a new command rbtree

At 2012-5-22 23:15, Dave Anderson wrote: Hello Dave, I will list all the situations I was concerning. First red-black tree: 1. rb_node is embedded in a structure. Address is the address of the structure, and -o shows the offset of rb_node to the structure. 2. same as 1., but the address is the address of rb_node when using -N in command line. rb_root was not concering. I will recall the reason. I can get the root node from rb_root. And then the offspring of the root node. Then I still need a offset that shows the offset of the offspring node to its related structure to get the structure's information. Then radix tree: 3. radix_tree_root's address is specified. 4. radix_tree_node's address is specified. According to your reply, "-r offset" indicates rb_root and radix_tree_root, and "-n offset" indicates rb_node and radix_tree_node. And if I use "-r offset", then I need another option to show the offset of rb_node. And when using "-n offset" together with an address, which can only be one of rb_node's address and address of the structure rb_node embedded in, I may need another option to indicate the address's type. So I think "tree -t type -r offset -n offset -m addr..." is a good choice. "-r offset" indicates the rb_root or radix_tree_root's offset, and "-n offset" indicates the rb_node or radix_tree_node's offset. When only using "-n offset" indicates the addr is related to rb_node or radix_tree_node, but if "-r offset" is also specified, the addr is related to rb_root or radix_tree_root. When "-m" is specified, the addr is the address of the root(when specified "-r offset") or the node. If "-m" is not specified, the addr is the address of the structure that containing the root(when specified "-r offset") or the node. Do you think it's OK? -- -- Regards Qiao Nuohan