On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote: Hi Mikhail, Could you please clarify why these are not two separate commits?

> - Update s390x_vr_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR() to include a non-zero vmalloc_start > check, making it consistent with s390x_generic_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR(). This one looks as a bug fix to me. > - Remove redundant vmalloc_start check from s390x_kvtop(). And this one is a follow-up optimization, unless there was a reason for this check before commit d0164e7 ("s390x: uncouple physical and virtual memory spaces"). Do you have any ideas?

> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; > --- > s390x.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) Thanks!