On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: So why did you stop including them in the mm patch? I recall your quality issue and Tom was all in favor of resolving them. Was it too much work cleaning up the patches to meet your needs that lead to the patch being dropped from the mm series? kgdb over ethernet is working great, and it looks like there is plenty of support on the SF mailing list. I've only read a positive point of view on resolving the issues on the mailing list. I agree, it would likely attract many more maintainers and be easier to maintain with git than patches. How about a concrete list of patch quality issues that the group can address to allow your weekly addition to the mm patch as a set toward eventually integration. Wouldn't getting kgdb back into the mm patch series be a reasonable first step eventual maintenance in kernel.org? I hadn't even noticed that it had been dropped until today's discussion in the crash mailing list. -piet -- Piet Delaney BlueLane Teck W: (408) 200-5256; piet(a)bluelane.com H: (408) 243-8872; piet(a)piet.net