[Crash-utility] Re: Crash-utility Digest, Vol 28, Issue 4
Luc:
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:36:53 -0500
From: Luc Chouinard <lchouinard(a)trueposition.com>
Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] sial.c's apigetctype
To: Discussion "list for crash utility usage, maintenance and
development" <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1199972213.18723.3.camel@NgVboss2>
Content-Type: text/plain
Bai, those code paths have been fine tuned based on my limited
understanding of the gdb type information layout. You cannot use a 'fall
through' in this switch. It's a one to one match test.
What's behind your question? Are you having problems with a script
and/or symbol/type resolution? If so, send us/me a test case.
Luc
I am very sorry for misunderstanding the meaning of your codes.
You are right,
break could not be deleted. Thank you for your providing this tool and
your expaining.