[Crash-utility] Re: Revert "arm64: section_size_bits compatible with macro definitions"

Hi Guanyou, On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9338(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Hi tao, lianbo > > Will it be merged before version 8.0.6 ? Yes, I'm handling it, will be merged shortly.

Thanks, Tao Liu > > Guanyou Chen <chenguanyou9338(a)gmail.com&gt; 于2024年9月20日周五 14:54写道： >> >> Thanks for the feedback! >> >> Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com&gt; 于2024年9月11日周三 11:02写道： >>> >>> Hi lianbo, >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> > >>> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Guanyou & lianbo, >>> >> >>> >> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be >>> >> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous: >>> >> >>> >> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) { >>> >> ... >>> >> else >>> >> ... >>> >> >>> >> hunk, so there is no need for the >>> >> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously >>> >> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to >>> >> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this. >>> >> >>> >> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang >>> > >>> > >>> > Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou. >>> > >>> > I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not needed.) >>> > >>> Agreed, let's go with the revert. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tao Liu >>> >>> > Thanks >>> > Lianbo >>>