Re: [Crash-utility] Fix bug of list -h

At 2012-6-6 21:44, Petr Tesarik wrote: > crash> list task_struct.tasks -s task_struct.tasks -h 0xeede04f0+432 > eede04f0 > > tasks = { > > next = 0xd79d6f20, > prev = 0xd55e6220 > > } > > d79d6d70 > > tasks = { > > next = 0xc32c5320, > prev = 0xeede06a0 > > } > > ... > > Note that the first element in the list (the one which contains the > starting list_head) is included. > > Based on the above, I'm afraid don't quite get the intended goal of your > patch. Hello Petr and Dave, I misunderstood the usage. What I really think is changing the start address from the address of list_head to the address of the structure where list_head is embedded. In many cases I use list command, I found I can get the address of the structure where the list_head embedded directly. And I can get the offset of list_head by -o option. So the offset, say "+432" in your example, can be omitted. What do you think of such change?