Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH]: symbol filtering

----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi, > >> > >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do the > >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch, > >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me. > > > > I suppose. It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in > > the case of x86. But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after > > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand. > > > > Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and > even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset> > printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a > patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative patch. > > /Per OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3, pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan.

Thanks, Dave > > > Anyway, I don't have a problem with the patch. Mika? > > > > Dave > > > > -- > > Crash-utility mailing list > > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility