----- Original Message -----
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:25:44 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>> but nonetheless, it does seem that Steve's patch
> > >>>> to the trace.c module is the better course of action. Does it
work
> > >>>> OK
> > >>>> for you?
> >
> > Yes Steve's patch fixes trace segfault for me.
>
> Ok good, thanks.
>
> I've cc'd this to the maintainer -- Xu, can you please review the patchset?
BTW, I tried to subscribe to the crash-utility discussion list, with no
response. I'd like to take a more active role in helping to maintain
the trace.so extension as I'm the one that will be breaking it in the
future ;-)
Also, I now have a team working on trace-cmd and the trace.dat file
will be getting more features that crash may want to take advantage of.
-- Steve
Hi Steve,
I didn't see your subscription request go by, but anyway, you're subscribed now.
And I wish the current Fujitsu maintainer of trace.c would respond. The package
has gone through a few hands since they originally wrote it. So I certainly
welcome your support.
Thanks,
Dave