Hi Hatayama,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:33 PM, HATAYAMA Daisuke
<d.hatayama(a)jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Hello Lei,
Thanks for making patch. I'll check your patch this week, but I have
two things to ask you.
1. I don't know arm architecture at all and I don't have arm
machine. What I can do is only testing common part and regression test
on x86 architecture. Please maintain arm part yourself.
Sure, it is my pleasure. :)
2. Could you tell me specific kernel versions you have tested this
patch in? I myself have yet to do this, but now I think it necessary
to make such a list. I imagine just like makedumpfile's SUPPORTED
KERNELS described in its README. I'll put them in gcore's README and
then ask Dave to add them into description in distribution page.
I am current testing with kernel 2.6.35.7 and 3.0.8, and they are both ok.
But I see below warnings during extracting, while the extracted core
dump image is
OK for gdb, I don't know whether it there is still some missing in
original implementation,
or those pages just don't existed in memory?
gcore: PT_LOAD[165]: af900000 - af90e000
gcore: WARNING: page fault at af909000
gcore: WARNING: page fault at af90d000
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
Thanks,
Lei