On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg(a)iki.fi> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:06:21PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Dave,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> Hi list,
> >> >>
> >> >> I find in current 6.1.4 crash, when load module with "mod
-S",
> >> >> only module's function symbol could be parsed out.
> >> >>
> >> >> But for module's global variant, crash cannot find related
> >> >> symbol...
> >> >> Any idea for this?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Without the debuginfo data from the module.ko.debug file, crash
> >> > gets all of its module symbol data from the kernel. So it uses
> >> > what's available in the in-kernel /proc/kallsyms list plus the
> >> > information stored in each module's "struct module".
The
> >> > store_module_symbols_v2() function does the work.
> >> >
> >> > If "mod -[sS]" is used, then crash has access to full
debuginfo
> >> > data
> >> > from the module.ko.debug file. In that case, the
> >> > store_load_module_symbols()
> >> > function does the work.
> >> >
> >>
> >> For current, what I saw is when I have loaded the module, only
> >> the t or T type symbol is installed, while others like d or D type it
> >> would not be loaded at all...
> >>
> >> While for one symbol, I already knows its member has a specific
> >> magic number, so that I search the memory, and find its virtual
> >> address becomes to 0xexxxxxxx, not the 0xbfxxxxxx.
> >> So does it mean the debuginfo in that module only has text related,
> >> while data type are all muted, and why?...
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lei
> >
> > I have no idea. With x86/x86_64 you can see text, data and bss
> > symbols both before and after the "mod -[sS]" command is run.
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
> Add Mike...
>
> Mike,
> Do you have any idea for this?
My first question would be are you now using the normal kernel kdump or the
custom one? The former is supported and used to work last time I tried. Back
at Nokia we had N9 kernel which had a lot of modules.
Yes, I don't use the kdump method, but very similar.
However could it explain why only module data could not be seen, while module
function is still there? ...
Thanks,
Lei
I have one beagleboard vmcore which seems to have modules loaded but
unfortunately I don't seem have the module .ko files anywhere around :-(
I believe Per and Jan are using more recent kernel on their ARM devices with
kdump enabled. Maybe they can provide more information on this?