HI Lianbo,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:40:22AM +0800, lijiang wrote:
Hi, Shijie
Thank you for the update.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:00 PM <crash-utility-request(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 19:03:23 +0000
> From: Huang Shijie <shijie(a)os.amperecomputing.com>
> To: k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com, lijiang(a)redhat.com
> Cc: patches(a)amperecomputing.com, zwang(a)amperecomputing.com,
> darren(a)os.amperecomputing.com, crash-utility(a)redhat.com, Huang
> Shijie
> <shijie(a)os.amperecomputing.com>
> Subject: [Crash-utility] [PATCH v2] diskdump: Optimize the boot time
> Message-ID: <20220330190323.2420144-1-shijie(a)os.amperecomputing.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> 1.) The vmcore file maybe very big.
>
> For example, I have a vmcore file which is over 23G,
> and the panic kernel had 767.6G memory,
> its max_sect_len is 4468736.
>
> Current code costs too much time to do the following loop:
> ..............................................
> for (i = 1; i < max_sect_len + 1; i++) {
> dd->valid_pages[i] = dd->valid_pages[i - 1];
> for (j = 0; j < BITMAP_SECT_LEN; j++, pfn++)
> if (page_is_dumpable(pfn))
> dd->valid_pages[i]++;
> ..............................................
>
> For my case, it costs about 56 seconds to finish the
> big loop.
>
> This patch moves the hweightXX macros to defs.h,
> and uses hweight64 to optimize the loop.
>
> For my vmcore, the loop only costs about one second now.
>
> 2.) Tests result:
> # cat ./commands.txt
> quit
>
> Before:
>
> #echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches;
> #time ./crash -i ./commands.txt /root/t/vmlinux /root/t/vmcore >
> /dev/null 2>&1
> ............................
> real 1m54.259s
> user 1m12.494s
> sys 0m3.857s
> ............................
>
> After this patch:
>
> #echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches;
> #time ./crash -i ./commands.txt /root/t/vmlinux /root/t/vmcore >
> /dev/null 2>&1
> ............................
> real 0m55.217s
> user 0m15.114s
> sys 0m3.560s
> ............................
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie(a)os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> v1 --> v2:
> 1.) change u64 to ulonglong.
> 2.) compile this patch in x86_64.
>
> ---
> defs.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> diskdump.c | 12 +++++++++---
> sbitmap.c | 19 -------------------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> index 81ac049..1e8360d 100644
> --- a/defs.h
> +++ b/defs.h
> @@ -4531,6 +4531,26 @@ struct machine_specific {
> #define NUM_IN_BITMAP(bitmap, x) (bitmap[(x)/BITS_PER_LONG] &
> NUM_TO_BIT(x))
> #define SET_BIT(bitmap, x) (bitmap[(x)/BITS_PER_LONG] |= NUM_TO_BIT(x))
>
> +static inline unsigned int __const_hweight8(unsigned long w)
> +{
> + return
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 0))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 1))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 2))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 3))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 4))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 5))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 6))) +
> + (!!((w) & (1ULL << 7)));
> +}
> +
> +#define __const_hweight16(w) (__const_hweight8(w) +
> __const_hweight8((w) >> 8))
> +#define __const_hweight32(w) (__const_hweight16(w) +
> __const_hweight16((w) >> 16))
> +#define __const_hweight64(w) (__const_hweight32(w) +
> __const_hweight32((w) >> 32))
> +
> +#define hweight32(w) __const_hweight32(w)
> +#define hweight64(w) __const_hweight64(w)
> +
>
No need to move the above code from sbitmap.c to defs.h, a simple way is to
implement a new function in sbitmap.c and add its definition in defs.h,
that will
be easy to call it in diskdump.c. For example:
diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
index 81ac0498dac7..0c5115e71f1c 100644
--- a/defs.h
+++ b/defs.h
@@ -5894,6 +5894,7 @@ typedef bool (*sbitmap_for_each_fn)(unsigned int idx,
void *p);
void sbitmap_for_each_set(const struct sbitmap_context *sc,
sbitmap_for_each_fn fn, void *data);
void sbitmap_context_load(ulong addr, struct sbitmap_context *sc);
+unsigned long get_hweight64(unsigned long w);
/* sbitmap_queue helpers */
typedef bool (*sbitmapq_for_each_fn)(unsigned int idx, ulong addr, void
*p);
diff --git a/sbitmap.c b/sbitmap.c
index 286259f71d64..628cc00c0b6b 100644
--- a/sbitmap.c
+++ b/sbitmap.c
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline unsigned int __const_hweight8(unsigned
long w)
#define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
+unsigned long get_hweight64(unsigned long w)
+{
+ return hweight64(w);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long min(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
return (a < b) ? a : b;
//diskdump.c
...
dd->valid_pages[i] += get_hweight64(tmp);
...
How about the above suggestions? Shijie and Kazu.
I moved these functions(hweightXX) to defs.h, because I thought they maybe used
by other code in future.
But anyway, it depends on you and Kazu to make the decision.
Thanks
Huang Shijie