Hi Xianting
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:36 AM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian(a)linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
在 2022/8/1 上午10:09, Yixun Lan 写道:
> HI Xianting:
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 8:56 AM Xianting Tian
> <xianting.tian(a)linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2022/7/30 上午7:29, Yixun Lan 写道:
>>> HI Xianting
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:11 PM Xianting Tian
>>> <xianting.tian(a)linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>> 在 2022/7/29 下午9:44, Yixun Lan 写道:
>>>>> Hi Xianting
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:55 AM Xianting Tian
>>>>> <xianting.tian(a)linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This series of patches are for Crash-utility tool, it make crash
tool support
>>>>>> RISCV64 arch and the common commands(*, bt, p, rd, mod, log,
set, struct, task,
>>>>>> dis and so on).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To make the crash tool work normally for RISCV64 arch, we need a
Linux kernel
>>>>>> patch(under reviewing), which exports the kernel virtual memory
layout, va_bits,
>>>>>> phys_ram_base to vmcoreinfo, it can simplify the development of
crash tool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Linux kernel patches:
>>>>>>
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220717101323.370245-1-xianting.tian...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series of patches are tested on QEMU RISCV64 env and SoC
platform of
>>>>>> T-head Xuantie 910 CPU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ====================================
>>>>>> Some test examples list as below
>>>>>> ====================================
>>>>>> ... ...
>>>>>> KERNEL: vmlinux
>>>>>> DUMPFILE: vmcore
>>>>>> CPUS: 1
>>>>>> DATE: Fri Jul 15 10:24:25 CST 2022
>>>>>> UPTIME: 00:00:33
>>>>>> LOAD AVERAGE: 0.05, 0.01, 0.00
>>>>>> TASKS: 41
>>>>>> NODENAME: buildroot
>>>>>> RELEASE: 5.18.9
>>>>>> VERSION: #30 SMP Fri Jul 15 09:47:03 CST 2022
>>>>>> MACHINE: riscv64 (unknown Mhz)
>>>>>> MEMORY: 1 GB
>>>>>> PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq
triggered crash"
>>>>>> PID: 113
>>>>>> COMMAND: "sh"
>>>>>> TASK: ff60000002269600 [THREAD_INFO:
ff60000002269600]
>>>>>> CPU: 0
>>>>>> STATE: TASK_RUNNING (PANIC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> carsh>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> p mem_map
>>>>>> mem_map = $1 = (struct page *) 0xff6000003effbf00
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> p /x *(struct page *) 0xff6000003effbf00
>>>>>> $5 = {
>>>>>> flags = 0x1000,
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> lru = {
>>>>>> next = 0xff6000003effbf08,
>>>>>> prev = 0xff6000003effbf08
>>>>>> },
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> __filler = 0xff6000003effbf08,
>>>>>> mlock_count = 0x3effbf08
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> },
>>>>>> mapping = 0x0,
>>>>>> index = 0x0,
>>>>>> private = 0x0
>>>>>> },
>>>>>> ... ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> mod
>>>>>> MODULE NAME BASE SIZE OBJECT
FILE
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e740 nvme_core ffffffff01133000 98304 (not
loaded) [CONFIG_KALLSYMS]
>>>>>> ffffffff011542c0 nvme ffffffff0114c000 61440 (not
loaded) [CONFIG_KALLSYMS]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> rd ffffffff0113e740 8
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e740: 0000000000000000 ffffffff810874f8
.........t......
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e750: ffffffff011542c8 726f635f656d766e
.B......nvme_cor
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e760: 0000000000000065 0000000000000000
e...............
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e770: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
................
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> vtop ffffffff0113e740
>>>>>> VIRTUAL PHYSICAL
>>>>>> ffffffff0113e740 8254d740
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PGD: ffffffff810e9ff8 => 2ffff001
>>>>>> P4D: 0000000000000000 => 000000002fffec01
>>>>>> PUD: 00005605c2957470 => 0000000020949801
>>>>>> PMD: 00007fff7f1750c0 => 0000000020947401
>>>>>> PTE: 0 => 209534e7
>>>>>> PAGE: 000000008254d000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PTE PHYSICAL FLAGS
>>>>>> 209534e7 8254d000 (PRESENT|READ|WRITE|GLOBAL|ACCESSED|DIRTY)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PAGE PHYSICAL MAPPING INDEX CNT FLAGS
>>>>>> ff6000003f0777d8 8254d000 0 0 1 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> bt
>>>>>> PID: 113 TASK: ff6000000226c200 CPU: 0 COMMAND:
"sh"
>>>>>> #0 [ff20000010333b90] riscv_crash_save_regs at
ffffffff800078f8
>>>>>> #1 [ff20000010333cf0] panic at ffffffff806578c6
>>>>>> #2 [ff20000010333d50] sysrq_reset_seq_param_set at
ffffffff8038c03c
>>>>>> #3 [ff20000010333da0] __handle_sysrq at ffffffff8038c604
>>>>>> #4 [ff20000010333e00] write_sysrq_trigger at
ffffffff8038cae4
>>>>>> #5 [ff20000010333e20] proc_reg_write at ffffffff801b7ee8
>>>>>> #6 [ff20000010333e40] vfs_write at ffffffff80152bb2
>>>>>> #7 [ff20000010333e80] ksys_write at ffffffff80152eda
>>>>>> #8 [ff20000010333ed0] sys_write at ffffffff80152f52
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Xianting Tian (8):
>>>>>> Add RISCV64 framework code support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Make crash tool enter command line and support
some commands
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add 'dis' command support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add 'irq' command support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add 'bt' command support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add 'help -r' command support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add 'mach' command support
>>>>>> RISCV64: Add the implementation of symbol verify
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Makefile | 7 +-
>>>>>> README | 2 +-
>>>>>> configure.c | 39 +-
>>>>>> defs.h | 248 +++++++-
>>>>>> diskdump.c | 21 +-
>>>>>> help.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> lkcd_vmdump_v2_v3.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> netdump.c | 22 +-
>>>>>> ramdump.c | 2 +
>>>>>> riscv64.c | 1414
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> symbols.c | 10 +
>>>>>> 11 files changed, 1759 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 riscv64.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm actually having problem with these patch set, got a
compiling error:
>>>>>
>>>>> === error log ===
>>>>> riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
>>>>> lkcd_common.c
>>>>> riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
>>>>> lkcd_v1.c -DMCLX
>>>>> riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -DRISCV64 -DGDB_10_2 -O2 -pipe
>>>>> lkcd_v2_v3.c -DMCLX
>>>>> In file included from lkcd_v1.c:21:
>>>>> lkcd_vmdump_v1.h:121:30: error: field ‘dh_regs’ has incomplete type
>>>>> 121 | struct pt_regs dh_regs;
>>>>> | ^~~~~~~
>>>>> make[5]: *** [Makefile:385: lkcd_v1.o] Error 1
>>>>> make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>> In file included from lkcd_v2_v3.c:21:
>>>>> lkcd_vmdump_v2_v3.h:90:30: error: field ‘dha_regs’ has incomplete
type
>>>>> 90 | struct pt_regs dha_regs;
>>>>> | ^~~~~~~~
>>>>> make[5]: *** [Makefile:388: lkcd_v2_v3.o] Error 1
>>>>> make[4]: *** [Makefile:1871: gdb] Error 2
>>>>> make[3]: *** [Makefile:10072: all-gdb] Error 2
>>>>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:860: all] Error 2
>>>>>
>>>>> crash build failed
>>>> It's strange, actually I didn't meet such compiling error by
'make
>>>> target=RISCV64', the compiling is OK.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have more details for the build?
>>>>
>>> FYI, I'm using source code of crash, commit: f37df7df8a50
>>> I don't think it's necessary to pass 'target' variable
explicitly, see
>>> the comment of Makefile
>>>
>>> ==== snip of Makefile
>>> # target could be set on command line when invoking make. Like: make
target=ARM
>>> # otherwise target will be the same as the host
>>> ifneq ($(target),)
>>> CONF_TARGET_FLAG="-t$(target)"
>>> endif
>>> ====
>>>
>>> besides, it actually recognized the correct target successfully
>>>
>>> ==== snip of build log
>>> make -j8 CC=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
>>> AR=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-ar 'CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe'
'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
>>> -Wl,--as-needed'
>>> TARGET: RISCV64
>>> CRASH: 8.0.1++
>>> GDB: 10.2
>>> ====
>> Sorry, I don't quite understand, we usually build crash tool on x86_64
>> for analyzing other ARCH's vmcore.
>>
>> As README shows, we need type target=XXX for analyzing XXX arch vmcore.
>> If we only use 'make' to build on X86_64, it is used to analyze
x86_64's
>> vmcore.
>>
>> I don't think "make -j8 CC=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc" is ok
for the
>> build. If I am wrong, please correct me. thanks
>>
> the difference is :
> I'm here using native compiling approach for crash utility, which mean
> the host OS distro is also a riscv64 (lp64d) Linux.
>
> # uname -a
> Linux unmatch 5.18.15-gentoo-riscv64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 30 20:12:16 CST
> 2022 riscv64 GNU/Linux
>
> this should also work as expected which already proved by arm64/ppc/etc..
Thanks, seems not all ARCHs support such build.
Anyway, I will add your fix as a separate patch to be included by my
patch set, and add "Co-developed-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan(a)gmail.com>"
hey, I think it's not quite an independent patch, so I'm totally fine
with it folding into other patches,
and since it's trivial, I don't mind dropping the "Co-developed-by"
tag,
instead if you like, you can add my "Tested-by" tag
thanks
Yixun