[Crash-utility] Re: Revert "arm64: section_size_bits compatible with macro definitions"

Hi lianbo, On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> Hi Guanyou & lianbo, >> >> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be >> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous: >> >> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) { >> ... >> else >> ... >> >> hunk, so there is no need for the >> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously >> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to >> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this. >> >> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang > > > Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou. > > I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not needed.) > Agreed, let's go with the revert. Thanks, Tao Liu > Thanks > Lianbo