[Crash-utility] Re: Revert "arm64: section_size_bits compatible with macro definitions"

Thanks for the feedback! Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com&gt; 于2024年9月11日周三 11:02写道： > Hi lianbo, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:32 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> Hi Guanyou & lianbo, > >> > >> I re-thought about the patch, and I agree the revert patch should be > >> applied, the reverted code is already covered by the previous: > >> > >> if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(5,12,0)) { > >> ... > >> else > >> ... > >> > >> hunk, so there is no need for the > >> CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES/CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES checks here. Previously > >> the patch was applied for the compatibility of android kernel due to > >> its customization, mainline kernel won't need this. > >> > >> What do you think? @Lianbo Jiang > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply, Tao and Guanyou. > > > > I agree with you, let's revert this one(because that patch seems not > needed.) > > > Agreed, let's go with the revert. > > Thanks, > Tao Liu > > > Thanks > > Lianbo > >