Re: [Crash-utility] Speed up list/tree '-s' output.

----- Original Message ----- > Hi Dave, > > I've updated the patch, leaving all existing fields and routines. > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hziSot/crash-patches/master/crash_speed... OK, thanks. Did you set the -S argument limit at 8 because you felt that the existing -s option had prevented you from using hq_enter()? If so, it would be preferable to make the -s and -S options mutually exclusive, and therefore allow -S to accept an unlimited number of entries.

> > Thanks, > Alexandr > ________________________________________ > From: crash-utility-bounces(a)redhat.com <crash-utility-bounces(a)redhat.com&gt; > on > behalf of Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 21:19 > To: Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development > Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] Speed up list/tree '-s' output. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Hi Dave, > > > > I've uploaded new patch: > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hziSot/crash-patches/master/crash_speed... > > > > Thanks, > > Alexandr > > Hi Alexandr, > > Right from the get-go, this patch needs to be reworked to maintain > backwards-compability w/respect to pre-existing users of the list_data > structure, and by extension, the do_list(), do_rbtree() and do_rdtree() > functions, which may be used by pre-existing extension modules. While you > do maintain the original -s options to both the list and tree commands, you > rip out the structure members the original data structures used, and the > simple code pieces that used them. So I can't accept that kind of change. > > Can you please make it so the original structname and structname_args > members will still be used by the -s options, and segregate your newly > added functionality? You can still add stuff to the end of exported > list_data and tree_data structures. > > Thanks, > Dave > > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility >