----- Original Message -----
Secondly, if the 3.11-rc1 kernel is configured with CONFIG_SLAB, the
crash
session will fail with a segmentation violation. Here is an example with a
crash version that has a bumped-up NR_CPUS and configured to use CONFIG_SLAB:
# crash vmlinux vmcore
crash 7.0.4rc17
Copyright (C) 2002-2013 Red Hat, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2010 IBM Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Hewlett-Packard Co
Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012 Fujitsu Limited
Copyright (C) 2006, 2007 VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.
Copyright (C) 2005, 2011 NEC Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999, 2002, 2007 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Mission Critical Linux, Inc.
This program is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions. Enter "help copying" to see the conditions.
This program has absolutely no warranty. Enter "help warranty" for
details.
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
<
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"...
please wait... (gathering kmem slab cache data)Segmentation fault
Although I haven't tested recent CONFIG_SLAB kernels (Fedora and RHEL use
CONFIG_SLUB
by default) I believe this is related to this patch-set that was pulled into
Linux 3.13:
Further testing shows that the segmentation violation above will only
occur in Linux 3.8 and later kernels if:
(1) the kernel is configured with CONFIG_SLAB, and
(2) the sum of the kernel's NR_CPUS and MAX_NUMNODES values exceed
the NR_CPUS value compiled into the crash utility.
That would be fairly unlikely, but it is true in with the "CONFIG_MAXSMP" setup
I'm testing with now. Typically (2) above is not true, and the crash session will
come up OK.
However, the 3.13 "slab-overload" patch that I pointed to here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/16/155
From: Joonsoo Kim <>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/15] slab: overload struct slab over struct page to reduce memory
usage
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:43:57 +0900
is the real issue at hand, because it will require a significant fix to support
CONFIG_SLAB kernels.
Thanks,
Dave