Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH]: gcore extension, anonymous union in inode struct

wrote:

From: Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com&gt; Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH]: gcore extension, anonymous union in inode struct Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:50:32 -0400 > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Per Fransson <per.fransson.ml(a)gmail.com&gt; >> Subject: [Crash-utility] [PATCH]: gcore extension, anonymous union in >> inode struct >> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:29:43 +0200 >> >> > Hi Crash people, >> > >> > The gcore extension fails on the 3.4 kernel I'm using. It attempts to >> > find the offset of a member within the inode struct, but the member is >> > part of an anonymous union. This patch fixes the problem for me. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Per >> >> Hello Per, >> >> Thanks for reporting that. According to git repository, this was >> changed by the following commit at the v3.1 period. >> >> $ git describe a78ef704a8dd430225955f0709b22d4a6ba21deb >> v3.1-8569-ga78ef70 >> >> $ git log -1 a78ef704a8dd430225955f0709b22d4a6ba21deb >> commit a78ef704a8dd430225955f0709b22d4a6ba21deb >> Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)suse.cz&gt; >> Date: Fri Oct 28 14:13:30 2011 +0200 >> >> vfs: protect i_nlink >> >> Prevent direct modification of i_nlink by making it const and adding a >> non-const __i_nlink alias. >> >> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi(a)suse.cz&gt; >> Tested-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima(a)jp.fujitsu.com&gt; >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de&gt; >> >> The patch appears fine to me so I'll apply it. >> >> Thanks. >> HATAYAMA, Daisuke > > Hi Daisuke, > > Will you be updating the crash-gcore-command tar.gz package? > Hello Dave, I have another gcore test plan soon. I'm going to update this change together with it. Please wait for a few weeks.

Thanks. HATAYAMA, Daisuke