Hi Georges, Lianbo,
On 2023/02/09 13:55, lijiang wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:08 PM Aureau, Georges (Kernel Tools ERT)
<
georges.aureau(a)hpe.com> wrote:
>
>> It could be good to check the return value of gdb_pass_through(). For
> example:
>
> This would not bring much value, if disasm fails, tmpfile would not have
> much to process anyway.
>
>
It's true. But if the gdb_pass_through() call fails, it will still
execute the remaining code. Seems that is not expected behavior.
ok I've added it and a commit log from Georges' description,
is the attached patch fine?
Thanks,
Kazu