On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:44:10AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
 
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
 > wrote:
 > >
 > >
 > > ----- Original Message -----
 > >> Hi,
 > >>
 > >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do
the
 > >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch,
 > >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me.
 > >
 > > I suppose.  It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in
 > > the case of x86.  But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after
 > > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand.
 > >
 > 
 > Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and
 > even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset>
 > printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a
 > patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative
patch.
 > 
 > /Per
 
 OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3,
 pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan. 
Sorry for being late. Both patches look good to me.