Thanks for the reply Dave.
Even I feel it is better to change the error message to what you have
suggested. That is simplest way to address the issue as well. It gives a
clearer message to the user.
I am curious to hear from Bud on the alternate scheme and progress
as well. Bud your views ?
Thanks
Sharyathi
On 04/23/2010 08:01 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
----- "Dave Anderson" <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> With this I wanted to know, if you intend to keep dev -p behavior
>> as it is now or there is any plan to change it to display actual
>> values?
>>
>> Thank You Sharyathi N
>
> I (personally) have no plans to change it. If I remember
> correctly, Bud Brown came up with an alternate scheme, but the
> imported data from the kernel proper required to accomplish it was
> enormous (bordering on absurd), so I suggested that it would be
> more appropriate as an extension module.
>
> Bud -- feel free to chime in here... ;-)
>
> For that matter, even the "old" way required the import of ~1000
> lines of kernel #define's -- which always bugged me -- and was
> pretty much the only crash command that had to do such a thing.
>
> Dave
Actually, at a minimum, I should change this:
if (!symbol_exists("pci_devices")) error(FATAL, "no PCI devices found
on this system.\n");
to the generic option_not_supported() message.
Dave