----- Original Message -----
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 00:13 +0000, Montgomery, Bob wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 21:59 +0000, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:18 +0000, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > While testing my search patch, I kicked off an unconstrained
physical
> > > > > search on a live session and hung the machine so thoroughly that
it
> > > > > required a visit to the machine room to physically unplug it to
get the
> > > > > remote console back up. Coincidence? Or should physical address
search
> > > > > on a live session be constrained somehow for safety?
>
> I'm guessing that's bad :-) I'll implement the rejector code in the
> physical search, and see if I can avoid a trip to the machine room.
Something like this? It seems to be surviving physical searches on my
live session now. Any reason this would thwart the purpose of the
physical search in any way? "But I wanted to search pci space..."
Nah -- it's meant for physical memory only.
Queued for version 5.1.3.
Thanks,
Dave