在 2022/7/26 上午1:13, Conor.Dooley(a)microchip.com 写道:
> That said, this does not apply to riscv/for-next:
> b4 shazam 20220725014539.1037627-1-xianting.tian(a)linux.alibaba.com
> Grabbing thread from
lore.kernel.org/all/20220725014539.1037627-1-xianting.tian%40linux.alibab...
> Checking for newer revisions on
https://lore.kernel.org/all/
> Analyzing 6 messages in the thread
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
> [PATCH v2 1/5] RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
> [PATCH v2 2/5] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
> [PATCH v2 4/5] RISC-V: Fixup getting correct current pc
> [PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: crash_core: Export kernel vm layout, phys_ram_base
> ---
> Total patches: 5
> ---
> Applying: RISC-V: use __smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id()
> Applying: RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> Patch failed at 0002 RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
patch 2 apply is OK for me, I don't know why you failed :(
Do you have more detals for this?