On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:37:42 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Dave,
>
> I'm sorry for the last submission. It seems I forgot to refresh the
> patches, so it was completely bogus. Should be fixed now. I'm also
> attaching my changes as one big patch to this message.
>
> Petr Tesarik
Hi Petr,
Hi Dave,
I've reviewed the code changes, and have been beating on the
patch, and I can't get it break. Really nice work...
[...]
I'd change it to this:
crash> help p
NAME
p - print the value of an expression
SYNOPSIS
p [-x|-d][-u] [expression | symbol[:cpuspec]]
Yes! It shows that cpuspec cannot be specified for arbitrary
expressions. In fact, I thought about implementing that feature,
but I doubt I could get it to work without patching gdb itself.
[...]
And maybe a minor indenting change for the cpu/address values,
from this:
struct desc_ptr {
crash> struct desc_ptr b0c8:1,3
[1]: ffff88021e24b0c8
struct desc_ptr {
[...]
to this:
crash> struct desc_ptr b0c8:1,3
[1]: ffff88021e24b0c8
struct desc_ptr {
I copied this code verbatim from the "p" command, so the extra spaces
are forgotten rather than intended.
[...]
But other than that, it looks good to go. Do you have anything
more to add?
No, it looks good now. Should I refresh the patch set, or can you
make the cosmetic changes in your tree yourself?
Petr Tesarik