Dear maintainers
Are there any comments for this patch set?
It's a regression issue,without the patch in some tiny kdump files
cannot be parsed.
Mathias Krause <minipli(a)grsecurity.net> 于2020年12月1日周二 下午4:35写道:
Am 01.12.20 um 03:56 schrieb Qianli Zhao:
> From: Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianli(a)xiaomi.com>
>
> Commit f42db6a33f0e ("Support core files with "unusual"
layout")
> increased the minimal file size from MIN_NETDUMP_ELF_HEADER_SIZE to
> SAFE_NETDUMP_ELF_HEADER_SIZE which lead to crash rejecting very
> small kdump files.
>
> Fix that by erroring out only if we get less than
> MIN_NETDUMP_ELF_HEADER_SIZE bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianli(a)xiaomi.com>
> ---
> - Update commit message
> - Add more accurate judgment of read() return value
> ---
> netdump.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/netdump.c b/netdump.c
> index c76d9dd..9a36931 100644
> --- a/netdump.c
> +++ b/netdump.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ is_netdump(char *file, ulong source_query)
> Elf64_Phdr *load64;
> char *eheader, *sect0;
> char buf[BUFSIZE];
> - size_t size, len, tot;
> + ssize_t size;
> + size_t len, tot;
> Elf32_Off offset32;
> Elf64_Off offset64;
> ulong format;
> @@ -142,10 +143,14 @@ is_netdump(char *file, ulong source_query)
> if (!read_flattened_format(fd, 0, eheader, size))
> goto bailout;
> } else {
> - if (read(fd, eheader, size) != size) {
> + size = read(fd, eheader, size);
> + if (size < 0) {
> sprintf(buf, "%s: ELF header read", file);
> perror(buf);
> goto bailout;
> + } else if (size < MIN_NETDUMP_ELF_HEADER_SIZE) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: file too small!\n", file);
> + goto bailout;
> }
> }
>
>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-and-tested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli(a)grsecurity.net>