On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:08 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com>
wrote:
 The nid member of struct memory_block is a 4-byte integer, but read
 and printed as a 8-byte integer on 64-bit machines.  Without the patch,
 the option displays wrong NIDs.
 
Good findings, Kazu.
Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com>
   crash> kmem -n
   ...
      MEM_BLOCK        NAME          PHYSICAL RANGE       NODE  STATE
  START_SECTION_NO
    ffff9edeff2b9400   memory0             0 -   7fffffff
 14195095130662240256  ONLINE  0
    ffff9edeff2bb400   memory2     100000000 -  17fffffff
 14195094718345379840  ONLINE  32
 The issue seems to appear on Linux 5.12 and later kernels that contain
 commit e9a2e48e8704c ("drivers/base/memory: don't store phys_device in
 memory blocks"), which changed the arrangement of the members of struct
 memory_block.
 Signed-off-by: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com>
 ---
  memory.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
 index 8c6bbe409922..600f2de336d9 100644
 --- a/memory.c
 +++ b/memory.c
 @@ -17564,13 +17564,13 @@ print_memory_block(ulong memory_block)
         if (MEMBER_EXISTS("memory_block", "nid")) {
                 readmem(memory_block + OFFSET(memory_block_nid), KVADDR,
 &nid,
 -                       sizeof(void *), "memory_block nid",
 FAULT_ON_ERROR);
 +                       sizeof(int), "memory_block nid", FAULT_ON_ERROR);
                 fprintf(fp, " %s %s %s %s  %s %s\n",
                         mkstring(buf1, VADDR_PRLEN, LJUST|LONG_HEX,
                         MKSTR(memory_block)),
                         mkstring(buf2, 12, CENTER, name),
                         parangebuf,
 -                       mkstring(buf5, strlen("NODE"), CENTER|LONG_DEC,
 +                       mkstring(buf5, strlen("NODE"), CENTER|INT_DEC,
                         MKSTR(nid)),
                         mkstring(buf6, strlen("OFFLINE"), LJUST,
                         statebuf),
 --
 2.27.0