[Crash-utility] Re: crash enhancements proposal

Maneesh Soni wrote: Ok, I've appended it as-is onto the crash.TODO list. Despite my objections and/or hesitance to include a few of them, the proof is in the pudding. All I ask is that patches are properly segregated where necessary, although you can do/put pretty much whatever you want in extension libraries -- say, for example, if you want to actually include a kernel header file. I just don't to introduce any reasons for compilation failures that don't exist now. Thanks guys, Dave