Hi,
Yes, it is one option.
(If I can not find any good idea, I will select this.)
Thanks.
Itsuro Oda
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:03:48 +0100
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser(a)eu.citrix.com> wrote:
On 3/10/08 07:02, "Itsuro ODA" <oda(a)valinux.co.jp>
wrote:
> I need to think the backword compatibility. I wonder how to determine
> the value of "PERCPU_SHIFT". The change of "PERCPU_SHIFT" was
made at
> a certain point of xen-unstable before xen-3.3 release. The xen version
> number (3.3) can't use as key... I will consider more...
Is the problem easier if you don't try to support every random snapshot of
xen-unstable? Why not constrain yourself to stable releases (or even random
snapshots of stable branches): then you could indeed just look for >=3.3?
-- Keir
--
Itsuro ODA <oda(a)valinux.co.jp>