Hi,
Yes, it is one option.
(If I can not find any good idea, I will select this.)
Thanks.
Itsuro Oda
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:03:48 +0100
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser(a)eu.citrix.com> wrote:
 On 3/10/08 07:02, "Itsuro ODA" <oda(a)valinux.co.jp>
wrote:
 
 > I need to think the backword compatibility. I wonder how to determine
 > the value of "PERCPU_SHIFT". The change of "PERCPU_SHIFT" was
made at
 > a certain point of xen-unstable before xen-3.3 release. The xen version
 > number (3.3) can't use as key... I will consider more...
 
 Is the problem easier if you don't try to support every random snapshot of
 xen-unstable? Why not constrain yourself to stable releases (or even random
 snapshots of stable branches): then you could indeed just look for >=3.3?
 
  -- Keir
 
  
-- 
Itsuro ODA <oda(a)valinux.co.jp>