Yes the netdump server is rhel 5 . As you suggested , i downloaded the rpm
kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.EL.i686.rpm
and found
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.EL.debug
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELhugemem.debug
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug
Upon running the crash on vmcore now this is what i get :
[root@dump 10.21.14.175-2009-01-22-14:00]# crash
/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug
/var/crash/10.21.14.175-2009-01-22-14\:00/vmcore
crash 4.0-3.14
Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006  Red Hat, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006  IBM Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999-2006  Hewlett-Packard Co
Copyright (C) 2005  Fujitsu Limited
Copyright (C) 2005  NEC Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999, 2002  Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002  Mission Critical Linux, Inc.
This program is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions.  Enter "help copying" to see the conditions.
This program has absolutely no warranty.  Enter "help warranty" for details.
crash: /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug: no text and data
contents
crash: The namelist argument supplied in this case is a debuginfo file,
which must be accompanied by the kernel file from which it was derived.
I need further help to proceed with this as i am new to rhel , kidly help me
guide through this. I know close to achieve this just that i need some
proper guidance.
Regards
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM, <crash-utility-request(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 Send Crash-utility mailing list submissions to
        crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        crash-utility-request(a)redhat.com
 You can reach the person managing the list at
        crash-utility-owner(a)redhat.com
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Crash-utility digest..."
 Today's Topics:
   1. netdump issue (Anirudh Srinivasan)
   2. RE: netdump issue (Vaughn Clinton)
   3. Re: netdump issue (Dave Anderson)
   4. Re: netdump issue (Jeff Moyer)
   5. [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES (Cliff Wickman)
   6. Re: [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES (Dave Anderson)
   7. Fwd: [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES (Dave Anderson)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:23:19 -0500
 From: Anirudh Srinivasan <srianirudh(a)gmail.com>
 Subject: [Crash-utility] netdump issue
 To: crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 Message-ID:
        <699b436a0901221323h2d6f0c13u1490a27235a7f776(a)mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
 I am implementing a netdump . I crashed one sever and got the vmcore file
 in
 /var/crash/vmcore , then i checked the kernel version through
 strings vmcore | fgrep -m1 'Linux'
 Linux version 2.4.21-40.ELsmp (bhcompile(a)hs20-bc1-7.build.redhat.com) (gcc
 version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-54)) #1 SMP Thu Feb 2 22:22:39
 EST 2006
 So now while installing the kernel-debuginfo , it should match the version
 above i.e something like "kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.ELsmp.i368.rpm"
 But i installed the closest one and that was
 kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.EL.i386.rpm but after installing them i should
 have /usr/lib/debug/module/vmlinux , which i could'nt see them .
 Can anyone give me the link to the rpm i am looking for , or suggest some
 idea. ( the server that i am dumping  vmcore is version 5 )
 I have bunch of server with version 2 and version 3  and version 4 in my
 production environment for which i have to configure netdump to collect the
 vmcore in version 5 server .
 --
 Regards
 Anirudh Srinivasan
 -------------- next part --------------
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20090122/45ea77...
 ------------------------------
 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:27:56 -0700
 From: Vaughn Clinton <vclinton(a)msn.com>
 Subject: RE: [Crash-utility] netdump issue
 To: <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
 Message-ID: <BAY103-W660A296BC102A4E779286CECE0(a)phx.gbl>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
 Version 5 servers now use kexec with a kdump facility mechanism that will
 allow for remote dumping of the core.  I'm not sure if netdump is
 functionally supported in your version of the kernel.
 Cheers,
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:23:19 -0500
 From: srianirudh(a)gmail.com
 To: crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 Subject: [Crash-utility] netdump issue
 I am implementing a netdump . I crashed one sever and got the vmcore file
 in /var/crash/vmcore , then i checked the kernel version through
 strings vmcore | fgrep -m1 'Linux'
 Linux version 2.4.21-40.ELsmp (bhcompile(a)hs20-bc1-7.build.redhat.com) (gcc
 version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-54)) #1 SMP Thu Feb 2 22:22:39
 EST 2006
 So now while installing the kernel-debuginfo , it should match the version
 above i.e something like "kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.ELsmp.i368.rpm"
 But i installed the closest one and that was
 kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.EL.i386.rpm but after installing them i should
 have /usr/lib/debug/module/vmlinux , which i could'nt see them .
 Can anyone give me the link to the rpm i am looking for , or suggest some
 idea. ( the server that i am dumping  vmcore is version 5 )
 I have bunch of server with version 2 and version 3  and version 4 in my
 production environment for which i have to configure netdump to collect the
 vmcore in version 5 server .
 --
 Regards
 Anirudh Srinivasan
 _________________________________________________________________
 Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
 Spaces. It's easy!
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friend...
 -------------- next part --------------
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20090122/d22dc3...
 ------------------------------
 Message: 3
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:01:34 -0500 (EST)
 From: Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
 Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] netdump issue
 To: "Discussion list for crash utility usage,   maintenance and
        development" <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
 Message-ID:
        <
 393446605.1264831232661693989.JavaMail.root(a)zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 >
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 ----- "Anirudh Srinivasan" <srianirudh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
 > I am implementing a netdump . I crashed one sever and got the vmcore
 > file in /var/crash/vmcore , then i checked the kernel version through
 >
 > strings vmcore | fgrep -m1 'Linux'
 > Linux version 2.4.21-40.ELsmp ( bhcompile(a)hs20-bc1-7.build.redhat.com
 > ) (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-54)) #1 SMP Thu Feb
 > 2 22:22:39 EST 2006
 >
 > So now while installing the kernel-debuginfo , it should match the
 > version above i.e something like
 > "kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.ELsmp.i368.rpm"
 >
 > But i installed the closest one and that was
 > kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.EL.i386.rpm but after installing them i
 > should have /usr/lib/debug/module/vmlinux , which i could'nt see them
 > .
 OK, so you're running -- and have crashed -- a RHEL3 i686 smp kernel,
 and the vmcore pinpoints the version as version 2.4.21-40.ELsmp.  So
 you need to install the kernel-debuginfo-2.4.21-40.EL.i686.rpm (not
 the "i386" version), which contains the vmlinux debug files for that
 kernel version:
  $ rpm -qpl kernel-debuginfo-2.4.21-40.EL.i686.rpm | grep vmlinux
  /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.EL.debug
  /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELhugemem.debug
  /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug
  $
 And the relevant file in your case would be located in
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug.
 >
 > Can anyone give me the link to the rpm i am looking for , or suggest
 > some idea. ( the server that i am dumping vmcore is version 5 )
 >
 > I have bunch of server with version 2 and version 3 and version 4 in
 > my production environment for which i have to configure netdump to
 > collect the vmcore in version 5 server .
 That's fine -- one way you can get the specific debuginfo package
 you need is by going to my people page:
   
http://people.redhat.com/anderson
 1. Click on the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux debuginfo RPMs" link.
 2. On that next page, in the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3" box,
   click on the "AS: i386" link.
 That will bring you to the ftp site that contains *all* RHEL3
 packages, so you have to search for:
  kernel-debuginfo-2.4.21-40.EL.i686.rpm
 Again, make sure you get the "i686" version.
 Hope this helps,
  Dave
 ------------------------------
 Message: 4
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:09:57 -0500
 From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer(a)redhat.com>
 Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] netdump issue
 To: "Discussion list for crash utility usage\,  maintenance and
        development" <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
 Message-ID: <x49sknbdmbu.fsf(a)segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Anirudh Srinivasan <srianirudh(a)gmail.com> writes:
 > I am implementing a netdump . I crashed one sever and got the vmcore file
 in
 > /var/crash/vmcore , then i checked the kernel version through
 >
 > strings vmcore | fgrep -m1 'Linux'
 > Linux version 2.4.21-40.ELsmp (bhcompile(a)hs20-bc1-7.build.redhat.com)
 (gcc
 > version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-54)) #1 SMP Thu Feb 2
 22:22:39
 > EST 2006
 > So now while installing the kernel-debuginfo , it should match the
 version
 > above i.e something like "kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.ELsmp.i368.rpm"
 >
 > But i installed the closest one and that was
 > kernel-debuginfo.2.4.21.40.EL.i386.rpm but after installing them i should
 > have /usr/lib/debug/module/vmlinux , which i could'nt see them .
 Not quite right.  If you do:
 # rpm -qpl kernel-debuginfo-2.4.21-40.EL.i686.rpm | grep vmlinux
 you'll see:
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.EL.debug
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELhugemem.debug
 /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug
 You, of course, want the smp version.  I'm assuming you want to examine
 the core file with crash.  If so, something like the following should
 work:
 crash /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-2.4.21-40.ELsmp.debug /path/to/vmcore
 > Can anyone give me the link to the rpm i am looking for , or suggest some
 > idea. ( the server that i am dumping  vmcore is version 5 )
 You mean the netdump server is running on a RHEL 5 system?  That is
 fine.
 > I have bunch of server with version 2 and version 3  and version 4 in my
 > production environment for which i have to configure netdump to collect
 the
 > vmcore in version 5 server .
 Right, running the netdump server on a RHEL 5 system is fine.  You
 should have no problems collecting vmcores from your AS 2.1, RHEL 3 and
 RHEL 4 systems.
 Cheers,
 Jeff
 ------------------------------
 Message: 5
 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:23:44 -0600
 From: Cliff Wickman <cpw(a)sgi.com>
 Subject: [Crash-utility] [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES
 To: crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 Message-ID: <E1LQ8tk-0002yp-6Q(a)eag09.americas.sgi.com>
 This patch enables stack unwind (on ia64) when using a kerntypes
 file for a namelist.
 When using a kerntypes file, we have just the address of variable unw
 and the definition of an unw structure.
 As you can see, I didn't change the indentation of the normal code.
 Simple to do, but I didn't want to clutter this patch for a first pass.
 I tested this against a live 2.6.16 (sles) kernel.
 Diffed against crash-4.0-7.6
 Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw(a)sgi.com>
 ---
  unwind.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 Index: crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 ===================================================================
 --- crash-4.0-7.6.ia64.orig/unwind.c
 +++ crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 @@ -1395,10 +1395,43 @@ unwind_init_v2(void)
  unwind_init_v3(void)
  #endif
  {
 +       int len;
        struct gnu_request request, *req;
        req = &request;
 +       if (LKCD_KERNTYPES()) {
 +               if ((len = STRUCT_SIZE("unw")) == 0) {
 +                       error(WARNING,
 +                       "cannot determine unw.tables offset; no struct
 unw\n");
 +                       machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 +                       return;
 +               }
 +               machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset =
 +                       MEMBER_OFFSET("unw", "tables");
 +               if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "r0"))
 +                       machdep->flags |= UNW_R0;
 +               /*
 +                * no verification of save_order, sw_off, preg_index as
 +                * we're purely depending on the structure definition.
 +                */
 +               if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "pt_regs_offsets")) {
 +                       machdep->machspec->unw_pt_regs_offsets =
 +                               MEMBER_OFFSET("unw",
"pt_regs_offsets") -
 +                               machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 +                       machdep->machspec->unw_kernel_table_offset =
 +                               MEMBER_OFFSET("unw", "kernel_table")
-
 +                               machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 +                       machdep->flags |= UNW_PTREGS;
 +               }
 +               if (!load_unw_table(CLEAR_SCRIPT_CACHE)) {
 +                       error(WARNING,
 +                               "unwind_init: cannot read kernel unw
 table\n");
 +                       machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 +               }
 +               machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
 +               /* fall to common structure size verifications */
 +       } else {
         if (get_symbol_type("unw", "tables", req) == TYPE_CODE_UNDEF)
{
                /*
                 *  KLUDGE ALERT:
 @@ -1449,6 +1482,7 @@ unwind_init_v3(void)
                machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
        }
 +       }
        verify_common_struct("unw_frame_info", sizeof(struct
 unw_frame_info));
        verify_common_struct("unw_table", sizeof(struct unw_table));
 ------------------------------
 Message: 6
 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:09:30 -0500 (EST)
 From: Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
 Subject: [Crash-utility] Re: [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES
 To: Cliff Wickman <cpw(a)sgi.com>
 Cc: crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 Message-ID:
        <
 2143976042.1441431232723370347.JavaMail.root(a)zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 >
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 ----- "Cliff Wickman" <cpw(a)sgi.com> wrote:
 > This patch enables stack unwind (on ia64) when using a kerntypes
 > file for a namelist.
 >
 > When using a kerntypes file, we have just the address of variable unw
 > and the definition of an unw structure.
 >
 > As you can see, I didn't change the indentation of the normal code.
 Nicely segregated.  But instead of leaving the indentation screwed up,
 I just inserted a "goto verify" at the bottom of your if statement and
 put the label at the proper location.
 > Simple to do, but I didn't want to clutter this patch for a first
 > pass.
 With that in place, should I just take the patch for the next release,
 or did you have something else you want to add?
 Dave
 >
 > ---
 >  unwind.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 >
 > Index: crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 > ===================================================================
 > --- crash-4.0-7.6.ia64.orig/unwind.c
 > +++ crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 > @@ -1395,10 +1395,43 @@ unwind_init_v2(void)
 >  unwind_init_v3(void)
 >  #endif
 >  {
 > +     int len;
 >       struct gnu_request request, *req;
 >
 >       req = &request;
 >
 > +     if (LKCD_KERNTYPES()) {
 > +             if ((len = STRUCT_SIZE("unw")) == 0) {
 > +                     error(WARNING,
 > +                     "cannot determine unw.tables offset; no struct
 unw\n");
 > +                     machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 > +                     return;
 > +             }
 > +             machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset =
 > +                     MEMBER_OFFSET("unw", "tables");
 > +             if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "r0"))
 > +                     machdep->flags |= UNW_R0;
 > +             /*
 > +              * no verification of save_order, sw_off, preg_index as
 > +              * we're purely depending on the structure definition.
 > +              */
 > +             if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "pt_regs_offsets")) {
 > +                     machdep->machspec->unw_pt_regs_offsets =
 > +                             MEMBER_OFFSET("unw",
"pt_regs_offsets") -
 > +                             machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 > +                     machdep->machspec->unw_kernel_table_offset =
 > +                             MEMBER_OFFSET("unw",
"kernel_table") -
 > +                             machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 > +                     machdep->flags |= UNW_PTREGS;
 > +             }
 > +             if (!load_unw_table(CLEAR_SCRIPT_CACHE)) {
 > +                     error(WARNING,
 > +                             "unwind_init: cannot read kernel unw
 table\n");
 > +                     machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 > +             }
 > +             machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
 > +             /* fall to common structure size verifications */
 > +     } else {
 >          if (get_symbol_type("unw", "tables", req) ==
TYPE_CODE_UNDEF)
 > {
 >               /*
 >                *  KLUDGE ALERT:
 > @@ -1449,6 +1482,7 @@ unwind_init_v3(void)
 >
 >               machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
 >       }
 > +     }
 >
 >       verify_common_struct("unw_frame_info", sizeof(struct
 > unw_frame_info));
 >       verify_common_struct("unw_table", sizeof(struct unw_table));
 ------------------------------
 Message: 7
 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:35:06 -0500 (EST)
 From: Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
 Subject: [Crash-utility] Fwd: [PATCH] crash: unwind with
        LKCD_KERNTYPES
 To: "Discussion list for crash utility usage,   maintenance and
        development" <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
 Message-ID:
        <
 947707277.1449411232724906430.JavaMail.root(a)zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 >
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 ----- Forwarded Message -----
 From: "Cliff Wickman" <cpw(a)sgi.com>
 To: "Dave Anderson" <anderson(a)redhat.com>
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:30:49 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash: unwind with LKCD_KERNTYPES
 Hi Dave,
 On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:09:30AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
 >
 > ----- "Cliff Wickman" <cpw(a)sgi.com> wrote:
 >
 > > This patch enables stack unwind (on ia64) when using a kerntypes
 > > file for a namelist.
 > >
 > > When using a kerntypes file, we have just the address of variable unw
 > > and the definition of an unw structure.
 > >
 > > As you can see, I didn't change the indentation of the normal code.
 >
 > Nicely segregated.  But instead of leaving the indentation screwed up,
 > I just inserted a "goto verify" at the bottom of your if statement and
 > put the label at the proper location.
 >
 > > Simple to do, but I didn't want to clutter this patch for a first
 > > pass.
 >
 > With that in place, should I just take the patch for the next release,
 > or did you have something else you want to add?
 Sounds good.  I have nothing more to add.  Thanks.
 -Cliff
 >
 > Dave
 >
 >
 > >
 > > ---
 > >  unwind.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 > >
 > > Index: crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 > > ===================================================================
 > > --- crash-4.0-7.6.ia64.orig/unwind.c
 > > +++ crash-4.0-7.6.ia64/unwind.c
 > > @@ -1395,10 +1395,43 @@ unwind_init_v2(void)
 > >  unwind_init_v3(void)
 > >  #endif
 > >  {
 > > +   int len;
 > >     struct gnu_request request, *req;
 > >
 > >     req = &request;
 > >
 > > +   if (LKCD_KERNTYPES()) {
 > > +           if ((len = STRUCT_SIZE("unw")) == 0) {
 > > +                   error(WARNING,
 > > +                   "cannot determine unw.tables offset; no struct
 unw\n");
 > > +                   machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 > > +                   return;
 > > +           }
 > > +           machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset =
 > > +                   MEMBER_OFFSET("unw", "tables");
 > > +           if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "r0"))
 > > +                   machdep->flags |= UNW_R0;
 > > +           /*
 > > +            * no verification of save_order, sw_off, preg_index as
 > > +            * we're purely depending on the structure definition.
 > > +            */
 > > +           if (MEMBER_EXISTS("unw", "pt_regs_offsets")) {
 > > +                   machdep->machspec->unw_pt_regs_offsets =
 > > +                           MEMBER_OFFSET("unw",
"pt_regs_offsets") -
 > > +                           machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 > > +                   machdep->machspec->unw_kernel_table_offset =
 > > +                           MEMBER_OFFSET("unw",
"kernel_table") -
 > > +                           machdep->machspec->unw_tables_offset;
 > > +                   machdep->flags |= UNW_PTREGS;
 > > +           }
 > > +           if (!load_unw_table(CLEAR_SCRIPT_CACHE)) {
 > > +                   error(WARNING,
 > > +                           "unwind_init: cannot read kernel unw
 table\n");
 > > +                   machdep->flags |= UNW_OUT_OF_SYNC;
 > > +           }
 > > +           machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
 > > +           /* fall to common structure size verifications */
 > > +   } else {
 > >          if (get_symbol_type("unw", "tables", req) ==
TYPE_CODE_UNDEF)
 > > {
 > >             /*
 > >              *  KLUDGE ALERT:
 > > @@ -1449,6 +1482,7 @@ unwind_init_v3(void)
 > >
 > >             machdep->machspec->unw = (void *)&unw;
 > >     }
 > > +   }
 > >
 > >     verify_common_struct("unw_frame_info", sizeof(struct
 > > unw_frame_info));
 > >     verify_common_struct("unw_table", sizeof(struct unw_table));
 --
 Cliff Wickman
 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
 cpw(a)sgi.com
 (651) 683-3824
 ------------------------------
 --
 Crash-utility mailing list
 Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
 End of Crash-utility Digest, Vol 40, Issue 11
 *********************************************